Another anti-semite.

124»

Replies

  • fishingcomicfishingcomic Senior Member Posts: 23,725 Senior Member
    edited April 12 #92

    @Steven said:
    Keith Ellison, Danny Davis, Craig Meeks, Andre Carson, Maxine Waters, James Clybourne have all met with Farrakhan outside of that meeting. Keith Ellison, who was named DNC Deputy Chair in 2016 has praised the man numerous time.

    Do you have evidence of that and what they said of those meetings from somewhere other than libtardssuck.com? Taking a meeting does not make them supporters and it certainly is no reason why they should denounce him daily. The man is irrelevant. Certainly less relevant than the Islamaphobe Franklin Graham.

    But I guess it is okay to express hatred of Muslims in the Republican party.

    'I've spoken of the Shining City all my political life. …In my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That's how I saw it, and see it still.'" Ronald Reagan
  • sherbsherb Senior Member Posts: 3,809 Senior Member

    @George K said:
    Peaceful solution - follow the American model: force the Palestinians to live in the least desirable places and survive on hand-outs. In return, call them a sovereign nation and let them be allowed to open casinos. >:)

    how dare you speak of my beloved Nevada that way.

  • StevenSteven Senior Member Posts: 3,356 Senior Member

    @fishingcomic said:

    @Steven said:
    Keith Ellison, Danny Davis, Craig Meeks, Andre Carson, Maxine Waters, James Clybourne have all met with Farrakhan outside of that meeting. Keith Ellison, who was named DNC Deputy Chair in 2016 has praised the man numerous time.

    Do you have evidence of that and what they said of those meetings from somewhere other than libtardssuck.com? Taking a meeting does not make them supporters and it certainly is no reason why they should denounce him daily. The man is irrelevant. Certainly less relevant than the Islamaphobe Franklin Graham.

    But I guess it is okay to express hatred of Muslims in the Republican party.

    It's all been widely reported. For example Keith Ellison denounced Farrakhan publicly but then refused to comment when the Washington Post found out he had had private lunches three times with Farrakhan since the denunciation.

    I'm not looking things up for you.

  • StevenSteven Senior Member Posts: 3,356 Senior Member

    Weiss will never call anybody an anti-Semite that is against a secular Jewish government in Israel. A guy who can claim that Zionists collaborated with N-azi's shouldn't be looked to for an opinion.

  • fishingcomicfishingcomic Senior Member Posts: 23,725 Senior Member

    @Steven said:

    @fishingcomic said:

    @Steven said:
    Keith Ellison, Danny Davis, Craig Meeks, Andre Carson, Maxine Waters, James Clybourne have all met with Farrakhan outside of that meeting. Keith Ellison, who was named DNC Deputy Chair in 2016 has praised the man numerous time.

    Do you have evidence of that and what they said of those meetings from somewhere other than libtardssuck.com? Taking a meeting does not make them supporters and it certainly is no reason why they should denounce him daily. The man is irrelevant. Certainly less relevant than the Islamaphobe Franklin Graham.

    But I guess it is okay to express hatred of Muslims in the Republican party.

    It's all been widely reported. For example Keith Ellison denounced Farrakhan publicly but then refused to comment when the Washington Post found out he had had private lunches three times with Farrakhan since the denunciation.

    I'm not looking things up for you.

    Mundinger rules.

    For example Keith Ellison denounced Farrakhan publicly

    So apparently you cannot be made happy. The Nation of Islam does get involved in charities and other community events so there may have been some common ground there.

    So is it okay to hate Muslims?

    'I've spoken of the Shining City all my political life. …In my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That's how I saw it, and see it still.'" Ronald Reagan
  • George KGeorge K Super Moderator Posts: 9,873 Senior Member

    This thread is becoming boring, so let me throw some fuel on the fire vis-a-vis the concept of "homeland". :D

    According to Flavius Josephus/Yosef Ben Matityahu, at the time of the Roman-Jewish Wars there were about half a million Jews living ancient Israel, and perhaps five or six million elsewhere in the Roman Empire, including Europe. (I can't remember where I read this, but it was more than once and from reputable books or magazines.

    Then there is a study demonstrating that Ashkenazim - the great majority of Jews today - have overwhelmingly European mitochondrial DNA. Their X chromosone DNA matches that of Sephardim.

    The most obvious reason is that despite Jewish lore about no intermarriage, Jewish men took local wives as they moved about the Roman Empire, including Europe. Granted, looks are literally superficial, but Ashkenazi Jews look "European" and not "Semitic" in that term's broad definition.

    Another study traces modern Ashkenazi Jews to just 350 individuals with DNA that is half European and half Middle Eastern. This group dates back only 600-800 years and is very inbred, leading to a number of diseases endemic to Ashkenazim.

    https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/genetic-roots-of-the-ashkenazi-jews-38580

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-350-people-study-finds/

    Keep your stinkin' government hands off my Medicare.
  • StevenSteven Senior Member Posts: 3,356 Senior Member

    @fishingcomic said:

    @Steven said:

    @fishingcomic said:

    @Steven said:
    Keith Ellison, Danny Davis, Craig Meeks, Andre Carson, Maxine Waters, James Clybourne have all met with Farrakhan outside of that meeting. Keith Ellison, who was named DNC Deputy Chair in 2016 has praised the man numerous time.

    Do you have evidence of that and what they said of those meetings from somewhere other than libtardssuck.com? Taking a meeting does not make them supporters and it certainly is no reason why they should denounce him daily. The man is irrelevant. Certainly less relevant than the Islamaphobe Franklin Graham.

    But I guess it is okay to express hatred of Muslims in the Republican party.

    It's all been widely reported. For example Keith Ellison denounced Farrakhan publicly but then refused to comment when the Washington Post found out he had had private lunches three times with Farrakhan since the denunciation.

    I'm not looking things up for you.

    Mundinger rules.

    For example Keith Ellison denounced Farrakhan publicly

    So apparently you cannot be made happy. The Nation of Islam does get involved in charities and other community events so there may have been some common ground there.

    So is it okay to hate Muslims?

    You don't get to play Mundinger rules.

  • fishingcomicfishingcomic Senior Member Posts: 23,725 Senior Member

    Is it okay to hate Muslims?

    'I've spoken of the Shining City all my political life. …In my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That's how I saw it, and see it still.'" Ronald Reagan
  • StevenSteven Senior Member Posts: 3,356 Senior Member

    @George K said:
    This thread is becoming boring, so let me throw some fuel on the fire vis-a-vis the concept of "homeland". :D

    According to Flavius Josephus/Yosef Ben Matityahu, at the time of the Roman-Jewish Wars there were about half a million Jews living ancient Israel, and perhaps five or six million elsewhere in the Roman Empire, including Europe. (I can't remember where I read this, but it was more than once and from reputable books or magazines.

    Then there is a study demonstrating that Ashkenazim - the great majority of Jews today - have overwhelmingly European mitochondrial DNA. Their X chromosone DNA matches that of Sephardim.

    The most obvious reason is that despite Jewish lore about no intermarriage, Jewish men took local wives as they moved about the Roman Empire, including Europe. Granted, looks are literally superficial, but Ashkenazi Jews look "European" and not "Semitic" in that term's broad definition.

    Another study traces modern Ashkenazi Jews to just 350 individuals with DNA that is half European and half Middle Eastern. This group dates back only 600-800 years and is very inbred, leading to a number of diseases endemic to Ashkenazim.

    https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/genetic-roots-of-the-ashkenazi-jews-38580

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-350-people-study-finds/

    The original mDNA study has been both refuted and supported since then by new studies.

    The bottleneck study was families, not individuals but still kind of mind blowing if accurate. It implies that a fairly large population was somehow greatly decreased down to a remnant (conversion?) and then came back.

  • George KGeorge K Super Moderator Posts: 9,873 Senior Member

    I would love to see additional research on this. Six-to-eight hundred years ago makes the plague one possible cause, aside from the usual wars and killings, but it is truly fascinating. Another implication is that whatever went on in Roman/Biblical times, there has been very little intermarriage among modern Ashkenazim. I think that's one reason Orthodox Israeli Jews are so opposed to Conservative and Reformed Judaism, mostly an American thing where intermarriage is common. The UK and parts of Europe have small groups of Liberal Jews who might be called ultra-conservative Conservative Jews here. I knew a few when I lived in a mostly Jewish neighborhood in London.

    Keep your stinkin' government hands off my Medicare.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Fly Fisherman stories delivered right to your inbox.