Got a question for the Christians (Christians only please)

Hextall

Do you guys think Jesus ever got an ****? Maybe he got the typical morning wood that we all get, but if it's a sin to have impure thoughts, and he was the living body and flesh of an all powerful God and not capable of sin, he probably didn't get one, right?

Also, let's bring up that without **** there would be no Israel whenever we can to needle our Jewish brethren on the Lodge.

creekguy

Boy, you are as bad as a CNBC debate questioner.
He was married, so no, probably not anymore.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/simcha-jacobovici/jesus-marriage-to-mary-th_b_6225826.html

Hextall

I have it on good authority that being married does not have a positive correlation to erections.

Buffco

He probably did. He was flesh, after all.

Buffco

Hextall wrote: »

I have it on good authority that being married does not have a positive correlation to erections.

The erections are there but there's no payoff.

I admire the little lady's figure and hair do every morning as she gussies up for work, and sport my appreciation at full mast. But to no avail.

George K

Go to bed earlier.

Hextall

Buffco wrote: »

and sport my appreciation at full mast. But to no avail.

Sounds like someone needs to get the Mrs. a Hubble for x-mas!

Hextall

Guys, what I'm trying to say is that maybe Mrs. Buffco didn't notice his fully erect **** is because said **** is so small. So I made a ridiculously overboard comment that she would need the hubble telescope to see his erect ****, even though using such a device would be impossible considering its size and the distances of objects it was designed to photograph. I don't even think a person can buy a Hubble telescope (Brookstone doesn't have it on their site), but I'll reserve the right to be wrong.

I hope that now we can see the point I was trying to make. Small ****.

****.

Buffco

Hextall wrote: »

Guys, what I'm trying to say is that maybe Mrs. Buffco didn't notice his fully erect **** is because said **** is so small. So I made a ridiculously overboard comment that she would need the hubble telescope to see his erect ****, even though using such a device would be impossible considering its size and the distances of objects it was designed to photograph. I don't even think a person can buy a Hubble telescope (Brookstone doesn't have it on their site), but I'll reserve the right to be wrong.

I hope that now we can see the point I was trying to make. Small ****.

****.

Well, I'm not showing it to her. I was simply making a counterpoint to your claim that marriages have no coorelation to erections. I do voice my current physical state to her but merely get looks of disgust. I would like to have relations while we're still semi-attractive.

Hextall

Buffco wrote: »

I would like to have relations while we're still semi-attractive.

You had me at hello.

fishingcomic

Hextall wrote: »

Guys, what I'm trying to say is that maybe Mrs. Buffco didn't notice his fully erect **** is because said **** is so small. So I made a ridiculously overboard comment that she would need the hubble telescope to see his erect ****, even though using such a device would be impossible considering its size and the distances of objects it was designed to photograph. I don't even think a person can buy a Hubble telescope (Brookstone doesn't have it on their site), but I'll reserve the right to be wrong.

I hope that now we can see the point I was trying to make. Small ****.

****.

You should have gone with electron microscope.