Home› The Lodge
Bush and Cheney...
....committed war crimes according to Richard Clark.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/29/richard-clarke-george-bush-war-crimes_n_5410619.html
Former Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clarke: Bush, Cheney Committed War Crimes
The Huffington Post | By Shadee Ashtari
Richard Clarke, the nation’s top counterterrorism official under former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, accused Bush and former Vice President **** Cheney of committing war crimes in their 2003 invasion of Iraq during an interview Tuesday with Democracy Now! that will air next week.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/29/richard-clarke-george-bush-war-crimes_n_5410619.html
Former Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clarke: Bush, Cheney Committed War Crimes
The Huffington Post | By Shadee Ashtari
Richard Clarke, the nation’s top counterterrorism official under former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, accused Bush and former Vice President **** Cheney of committing war crimes in their 2003 invasion of Iraq during an interview Tuesday with Democracy Now! that will air next week.
Replies
Not sure why he is continually infatuated with this stuff.
I'd say more concerned than infatuated. Actually more power to him, if we would pay more attention to what our politicians are up to, this stuff might not happen.
'Course it is more important what Caitlyn, Kim and Kanye are doing..
Mike
I say infatuated.
http://forums.flyfisherman.com/search.php?searchid=906756
If he is right though, wouldn't this warrant concern? If this were about Obama, you would be all over it.
I am not convinced that any verdict that is derived without the accused being allowed to present his case and face his accusers is valid. As to Wilkerson's indictments, the administration sought the advice of council before proceeding with the enhanced techniques, and the surveillance of Americans is only prosecutable in an American court. We can spy on anyone we want outside our borders and many other countries do.
Not really. Seems to be an ongoing thing that common folk have no control over so why get worked up about it?
I get being concerned about this stuff but I don't let it consume me to the point where thats all I talk about.
Nope. But since you mentioned it...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/11/amnesty-us-concealed-troops-war-crimes-in-afghanistan-as-recently-as-last-year.html
The ironic thing is you continually ruminate on why Ed is so infatuated with this stuff. To find the answer, look in the mirror.
Maybe if Ed discussed other things besides war crimes/money system I wouldn't ruminate about his infatuation.
First, we aren't members.
Second, even if we were, the ICC had no definition of war of aggression until 2010.
Third, even if we were, our actions didn't violate the Geneva Convention.
Fourth, even if we were, the ICC does not hear violations of the UN Human Rights Convention. Only the Security Council does (of which we are a member).
Personally, I don't give a fly you know what, but I recognize that others do and I believe they have good some valid reasons for their opinions.
Why worry about whether or not a president sent thousands of our countries bravest to die in war that was based on a lie?
You got something that does not come from a lying **** rag?
But just so we are clear, Obama's pentagon was Bush's pentagon and will be Hillary's pentagon. This is not something that changes significantly with administrations. They don't clean house upon their arrival.
You are right that he's set in his ways.
Oh well...
No because I'm not too concerned. I posted the first link I found, just for fun, in repsonse to your Obama comment.
You're sure?
"Why worry about whether or not a president sent thousands of our countries bravest to die in war that was based on a lie?"
Can you answer Comic's question Joe?
I'm Steven
You're sure?
Yeah, I'm sure.
Reasonably. The one time we met, we talked about fishing.
Please tell us you will leave the country if she wins.
Wouldn't it be nice if he did that here?
Me: Did you catch any?
Ed: A few.
It's unfortunate that it happened Ed, but worrying about it isn't going to change what happened in the past, and most likely won't prevent it from happening in the future.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/if-bush-is-a-war-criminal_b_5416535.html