Home› The Lodge
If You Don't Agree w Gay Marriage You Are Screwed
No cake = discrimination
No pizza = discrimination
Sure I will make you some wedding rings for your gay nuptials = how could you; you hateful discriminatory bigot.
Isn't it fantastic how tolerant the left is? Even when you don't discriminate they do.
You either support gay marriage 100% or you are a bigot. Your right to an opinion can't be tolerated.
What a bunch of nut jobs.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418801/tolerant-jeweler-who-harbored-impure-opinion-same-sex-marriage-charles-c-w-cooke
No pizza = discrimination
Sure I will make you some wedding rings for your gay nuptials = how could you; you hateful discriminatory bigot.
Isn't it fantastic how tolerant the left is? Even when you don't discriminate they do.
You either support gay marriage 100% or you are a bigot. Your right to an opinion can't be tolerated.
What a bunch of nut jobs.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418801/tolerant-jeweler-who-harbored-impure-opinion-same-sex-marriage-charles-c-w-cooke
Replies
Hyperbole much?
BTW what is wrong with the jeweler saying, "Sorry all sales are final?"
And also they did not just happen to find out he was opposed to gay marriage, he campaigned against it.
http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/2015-05-18/article-4150483/Jeweller-says-he-has-been-bullied,-threatened/1
Mike
A horrible choice to bake a wedding cake.
Holy crap they knew that going in. What a pair of insufferable ****. How pathetic and awful.
A genius.....
Hextall, you're up..
Mike
I don't think they did. Otherwise why do the fitting?
Notice the timeline.
The whole point is his beliefs shouldn't matter one lick. He sold them the rings. Who cares what he thinks. Why should it matter? It wouldn't matter to sane people. The whole **** point is he didn't discriminate against them at all and they are still pissed...it is freaking unbelievable.
BTW you writer deceptively implies they delved into his heart to find about his beliefs. If someone is going to actively campaign against your equality, why should you give him your business. They are doing what you free market types insist should be the solution, and yet that is not enough for you. We must fully support your prejudices or we are bullies.
I think the dixie chicks suck and always have. I like country music and never liked them. That being said if I had bought their album and then would have been pissed off by their position I wouldn't have demanded a refund. Why...because that would be idiotic.
Celebrities positions are frequently well known. Store owners and staff probably not so much.
If people care about someone's beliefs I guess they better start running a background check on them before thy shop at their store.
If the title of this thread were honest it would read, "When you openly claim homosexuals should be treated as second class citizens they will not buy your goods and the public will turn against you."
+1 .
Trouble is, we live in a constitutional republic, not a theocracy. Lovers of theocracy should convert to Islam and live in an area controlled by ISIS.:o
BTW - How does one enter a small jewelry store and not notice a poster that is displayed there?
They didn't later uncover what was in his heart. The man had put up signs in his store opposing their marriage. He was actively campaigning against their marriage.
Leaving that piece of information out was a lie by omission.
Again no window into soul. There was an actual sign and they did not bully him. They simply requested a refund, which he agreed to.
Why should they give business to a man that publicly proclaims in his place of business that they are unworthy and should be treated as second class citizens?
No they didn't. From the article, the jewerly store owner said, “We understand now that these attacks have nothing to do with Nicole or Pam they have been really nice and just want their money back to go buy elsewhere so we are giving them their money back.”
You should read more better, you insufferable ****.
As you pointed out, this isn't a theocracy, where the problem wouldn't arise, because the theocracy would just call the swordsman.
Maybe it wasn't there when they made the deposit.
Clearly you do not understand what a wedding/marriage is and the role of clergy in it.
Marriage is a civil contract requiring a license issued by the state. The participation of clergy is purely optional, but when clergy officiates they are acting as an agent of the state. No member of the clergy can be forced to perform the ceremony (on behalf of the state).
https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/once-father-and-son-now-a-married-couple-120039861077.html