NRA says Bumpstocks

creekguycreekguy Senior MemberPosts: 3,905 Senior Member
can be outlawed!
are they going all
gingerkitten.jpg on us?

Replies

  • Shawn C.Shawn C. Senior Member Posts: 5,439 Senior Member
    Not enough. Not nearly enough.

    F*** the NRA terrorists with a flag pole.
  • BufordBuford Senior Member Posts: 2,821 Senior Member
    Shawn C. wrote: »
    Not enough. Not nearly enough.

    F*** the NRA terrorists with a flag pole.

    You funny. The justice department deemed them legal not the NRA.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/the-goofy-little-doodad-approved-under-obama-that-was-used-in-las-vegas-carnage/2017/10/04/3a1a2104-a935-11e7-850e-2bdd1236be5d_story.html?utm_term=.509559309ced
    Just look at the flowers Lizzie just look at the flowers.
  • creekguycreekguy Senior Member Posts: 3,905 Senior Member
    “The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations,” read a statement issued by the powerful organization Thursday.
  • BufordBuford Senior Member Posts: 2,821 Senior Member
    creekguy wrote: »
    “The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations,” read a statement issued by the powerful organization Thursday.

    OK. This is bad?
    Just look at the flowers Lizzie just look at the flowers.
  • ricinusricinus Senior Member Posts: 6,214 Senior Member
    creekguy wrote: »
    “The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations,” read a statement issued by the powerful organization Thursday.

    Why not just ban them?

    Mike
    My new goal in life is to become an Alter Kaker...
  • creekguycreekguy Senior Member Posts: 3,905 Senior Member
    Buford wrote: »
    OK. This is bad?

    Bu, the point of my original post was that the NRA has been so adamant about ANY gun laws, and now they are showing some softness (reason?). Does this show some change in policy? we will see.
  • BufordBuford Senior Member Posts: 2,821 Senior Member
    ricinus wrote: »
    Why not just ban them?

    Mike

    I'm betting that will be the end result. Again is this bad?
    You do realize you can do the exact same thing with a shoe string and your belt loop.
    Just look at the flowers Lizzie just look at the flowers.
  • BufordBuford Senior Member Posts: 2,821 Senior Member
    creekguy wrote: »
    Bu, the point of my original post was that the NRA has been so adamant about ANY gun laws, and now they are showing some softness (reason?). Does this show some change in policy? we will see.

    Like I said you can do the same thing with a string and belt loop. All it does is get the barrel hot and waste ammo. When someone improved on the shoe string method with these bump fire stocks I was really surprised the ATF said they were OK. I just couldn't see the NRA putting up support for these stocks.
    Just look at the flowers Lizzie just look at the flowers.
  • FishTXFishTX Super Moderator Posts: 7,661 Senior Member
    Buford wrote: »
    I was really surprised the ATF said they were OK.
    The ATF doesn't write the laws. It had to assess whether the bump stops were legal under existing law. Also they took into account that the manufacturer claimed they designed for people with upper limb disabilities. That description sounds stupid considering it would be awkward to use one without two arms and hands that are at least mostly functional.
    "We have to find someone who can not only fly this plane, but who didn't have fish for dinner."

    Crooow:This music would work better with women in bikinis shaking all over the place. I guess that's true of any music really.
  • BufordBuford Senior Member Posts: 2,821 Senior Member
    FishTX wrote: »
    The ATF doesn't write the laws. It had to assess whether the bump stops were legal under existing law. Also they took into account that the manufacturer claimed they designed for people with upper limb disabilities. That description sounds stupid considering it would be awkward to use one without two arms and hands that are at least mostly functional.

    I'm thinking more alone the lines of serious arthritis not amputees.
    Just look at the flowers Lizzie just look at the flowers.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file